Messy Plays™
Staying in the Mess · Set 01
Each play takes one finding from a real research paper and turns it into something you can actually feel — alone or with people you know.
↓ scroll
What are Messy Plays?
A series of experiential learning plays — each one grounded in a real research paper.
You do the experience first. Then you read why it works. The insight lands differently when you've felt it — not just read about it.
Each card takes about 15 minutes solo. Works equally well with friends, family, or a small group. No facilitator. No prior knowledge. Just curiosity and a willingness to stay in the mess a little longer than feels comfortable.
The idea behind Messy Plays
Research that lives in the body,
not just the brain.
Most self-improvement content tells you what to think. Messy Plays ask you to feel something first — then explain the research after. That sequence changes what sticks.
Why this exists
Research that could change how you think about a problem stays locked in academic journals most people never open. The insights are real. The access isn't. Messy Plays close that gap — one play at a time.
How it works
The sequence is the method. You enter a situation before you understand why it was designed. You feel resistance, curiosity, or discomfort — whatever the card produces in you. Only after the experience does the research arrive to name what just happened. Understanding follows feeling. That's not just a design choice. It's why the insight sticks.
What it is
A growing series of plays, each grounded in a different research paper. Every play contains six cards — five experiences plus an orientation card — one per element of the MESSY framework. Staying in the Mess is the first play, built around Salmon & Steinberg's 2007 research. It's free. More plays are in development.
Staying in the Mess.
Messy Plays™ · Play 01
Based on Salmon & Steinberg (2007)
Overview
Most of us have a deeply trained reflex: when something gets complex, messy, or uncomfortable, we move toward resolution before we've understood what we're actually dealing with. We jump to solutions. We escape. We call the backward movement failure.
This set is built around a single research paper — Salmon and Steinberg's 2007 study of social workers who chose to descend into what the researchers called "the swamp of important problems." Their finding was both counterintuitive and immediately recognizable: the problems most worth solving resist technical solutions. They require staying in the mess long enough, methodically enough, for something real to emerge.
Five cards. Five practices. One coherent arc — from noticing the escape reflex, to practicing resistance, to building sustainable support, to releasing the judgment that backward is bad, to extracting the wisdom that only mess produces.
What you'll walk away with
A felt sense of your own fix-it reflex — not just awareness of it in theory, but recognition of exactly when and how strongly it fires in real situations.
The experience of staying in a problem rather than resolving it prematurely — and the insight that the problem often looks different after you've stayed in it.
One concrete, simple support structure you've actually designed for yourself — not aspirational, but built for your worst days.
A reframe of backward movement — the ability to see regression and non-linear progress as part of how things actually move, rather than evidence of failure.
Specific wisdom extracted from a real mess you've already lived through — something you couldn't have accessed without having stayed in it.
Who this is for
This set will resonate most with people who regularly sit with other people's complexity — and their own.
Coaches & facilitators
Who notice they jump to solutions before the real problem has surfaced
Leaders & managers
Who feel pressure to have answers and find that pressure makes things worse
Parents & partners
Who love someone going through something difficult and keep trying to fix what isn't theirs to fix
MESSY Playbook users
Who want to feel the framework rather than just understand it
Curious newcomers
Who haven't heard of the Playbook but are exhausted by optimization culture and ready for something honest
This set is probably not for you if you're looking for techniques to resolve problems faster, strategies to eliminate complexity, or a system that rewards completion and optimization. These cards don't do any of that. They do the opposite.
Part of the MESSY Playbook ecosystem
The felt sense of why
the framework matters.
The MESSY Playbook gives you a framework for working with complexity instead of against it. Messy Plays give you the direct experience of why that framework exists. Each play corresponds to one of the five MESSY practices. If you already have the Playbook, these plays deepen the work. If you're new, they're a doorway in.
Just notice.
Count your urges to fix without acting on them
Don't fix it.
Stay in the problem 10 minutes before reaching for a solution
Design your floor.
Strip your support down to the minimum that works
Name what moved.
Track direction — forward, back, sideways — no judgment
Harvest the mess.
Extract what only the mess could have taught you
Don't have the Playbook yet? Explore it here →
Staying in the Mess · Six cards
Start with the orientation card.
It frames the set and points you toward the right card for where you are right now. Then work through the remaining five in any order that makes sense. Each card takes about 15 minutes solo — plan for more in a group, because the conversation it starts is part of the experience.
Why this exists
Most self-improvement keeps you on the high ground — safe, manageable, and ultimately unimportant. The problems that actually matter live in the swamp. These cards help you go there.
How it works
Each card translates one research insight into a direct experience. You don't read about the finding. You feel it first. The research explains what just happened after.
What's in this set
Five cards grounded in Salmon & Steinberg's research on productive mess — one for each element of the MESSY framework. Solo or with people you actually know. No facilitator needed.
Where are you right now?
Tap the one that resonates most. We'll tell you where to start.
The situation
Someone near you is talking about something difficult. A problem. A frustration. Something unresolved. They haven't asked for your help.
Your only job is to notice what happens inside you as you listen. Not fix it. Not respond differently. Just watch yourself.
The constraint
Every time you feel the urge to fix, redirect, or resolve — mark it below. Say nothing. Just count.
You're looking for:
Going solo? Recall a recent conversation where someone shared a problem. Replay it in your mind. Count every moment you felt the pull to intervene.
urges counted
When the conversation ends, flip to the reveal.
The situation
Someone you know is stuck. Same wall, different week. You've heard the story. You have thoughts. You probably know exactly what they should do.
Today your only job is to understand the problem better. Not fix it. Just understand it.
The constraint
For 10 minutes, solutions are banned.
You may only:
Going solo? Think of something in your own life you keep trying to fix. Write for 10 minutes using only the three options above.
Cards 01 and 02 worked with what's happening now. This card — and the two that follow — ask you to look back. Past patterns. Past messes. What they reveal is often clearer from a little distance.
The situation
There's a messy situation in your life you regularly escape from. Not because you're weak. Because nothing you've built makes staying in it feel possible.
Today you're going to design the minimum thing that would keep you in the mess instead of out of it.
The constraint
Your support structure must be simpler than what you currently do. Not more elaborate.
Work through these three steps:
Step 1 · The mess I keep escaping
Step 2 · What I currently do when it gets hard
Step 3 · The one simpler thing
12 words max
In a group? Each person works through the steps independently first, then shares their Step 3 answer. Whose is the simplest? Would anyone use someone else's?
The situation
Think of something that felt like failure or regression — a project, a relationship, a goal. Something that seemed to go backwards just when it should have moved forward.
You're going to map what actually moved. Not whether it was good or bad. Just direction.
The constraint
Describe each phase as a direction. No judgment allowed.
Not "it went badly" or "we succeeded." Only: forward, back, or sideways.
Name the situation
Name the moves
→ forward · ← back · ↔ sideways
Your movement pattern will appear here
In a group? Each person maps their own situation independently, then shares their pattern. What shapes appear? Does anyone see the same moves in a different order?
The situation
Think of a mess you've already lived through. Something genuinely difficult and unresolved for a long time. Not something you're in right now — something you came out the other side of.
You're going to extract what it actually taught you. Not what happened after. What the mess itself produced.
The constraint
Your answer cannot contain the word "but."
"But" qualifies the mess away. Your wisdom lives in what's left when you remove it.
Name the mess
What did this teach you that a clean resolution would have prevented?
What would you have missed if it had resolved cleanly and quickly?
In a group? Each person writes their wisdom, then reads it aloud. The group listens for buts that snuck through. When they find one, they ask: what would it sound like without that?
You made it through all five.
Now take three minutes.
Not to optimize what you learned. Just to let it settle. These questions aren't an assignment — they're an invitation to notice what the set produced in you.
Which card landed hardest — and why do you think that one?
What shifted across the five cards that you didn't expect?
What's one thing you'll do differently this week because of what you noticed?
The cards don't produce transformation. They reveal the capacity that was already there. You did the work. The mess was the teacher.
Research attribution
The source behind Set 01.
Messy Plays are grounded in real academic research. Staying in the Mess draws entirely from the following paper. If the cards resonated, this is worth reading in full.
APA 7th Edition
Salmon, R., & Steinberg, D. M. (2007). Staying in the mess: Teaching students and practitioners to work effectively in the swamp of important problems. Social Work with Groups, 30(4), 79–94.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J009v30n04_06MLA 9th Edition
Salmon, Robert, and Dominique Moyse Steinberg. "Staying in the Mess: Teaching Students and Practitioners to Work Effectively in the Swamp of Important Problems." Social Work with Groups, vol. 30, no. 4, 2007, pp. 79–94.
Messy Plays use insights from research for educational and personal development purposes only. The experiences are original designs inspired by the research — not reproductions of the authors' materials. The original paper and all rights remain with the authors and publisher.
Play 02 is in development.
Explore The MESSY Playbook →Get MESSY!
The mess isn't the obstacle. It's the map.